Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5195 14
Original file (NR5195 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
iv TT OTE NI A Ura
Th K d OF Tre mA OT

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 5, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

TIR
Docket No: 5195-14
31 October 20144

This is in reference to your application for correction of your

naval record pursuant tc the Provisions of Title 16, United
States Code, Section 1552.

A three-member panei of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive Session, considered your
application on 28 October 2014. The hames and votes of the
members of the panel will be furnished upon request, Your
allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance
with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all
material. submitted “in Support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. in addition, the
Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by Headquarters
Marine Corps, copies of which are attached,

After careful ang conscientious consideration of the entire
tecord, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence cof probable material
€rrer or industice, tn this regard, the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinions.

Accordingly, your application has been denied,

It is regretted that the circumstances of -your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. “You are entitled-to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material

   

ROBERT J. O/ NEILL
Executive Director

closures . : er “4

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4162 14

    Original file (NR4162 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05574-01

    Original file (05574-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP:ddj Docket No: 2 October 2001 5574-01 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the I.Jnited States Code, section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2001. references (c) and (d) for members like...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06037-01

    Original file (06037-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    13oartl for panel of the (lorrection of Naval Records, sitting in executive A three-member session, considered your application on 27 November 200 injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of to the proceedings of this tted in support thereof, your naval record and your application, atldi tion, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations opinion...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01330-01

    Original file (01330-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    D.C. 20350-2000 Y REFER TO IN REPLY 5420 N130Dl/ OlU1104 22 Jun 01 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj : COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF PETTY OFFICER L Encl: (1) BCNR case file #01330-01 with microfiche service record The following provides comment and recommendation on Petty 1. shipped to Active Petty Officer In his petition, Petty Office - V According EB eligible ratings and award levels are announced 4. to GENADMIN 31111472 JUL 98...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5864 14

    Original file (NR5864 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NT i] F THE NAVY ACO ADOTA wit in POARD FOR COR ection OF NAVAL REG! Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board also considered the advisory opinion furnished by Navy Personnel Command (NPC) memo 5420 PERS-806 of 17 Jul 2014, @ copy of which was provided to you on 1.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3054 14

    Original file (NR3054 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 October 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9699 14

    Original file (NR9699 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 October 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. NPS69S-14 rection of an official naval Consequently, when applying for a cor demonstrate the existence of record, the burden is on the applicant...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3396 14

    Original file (NR3396 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In making this determination, the Board concurred with the comments your application has contained in the advisory opinion. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06207-01

    Original file (06207-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 JLP:ddj Docket No: 6207-01 27 November 2001 This is in provisions of title reference to your application for- correction of your naval record pursuant to the IO of the Ilnited States Code, section 1552. wert‘ reviewed in accordance wit panel of the three-mrmher A session, considered your iii_justice to the proceedings your application, applicable opinion furnished by copy of which is...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4254 14

    Original file (NR4254 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. Consequently, when appiying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.